Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Control | _lluks_ | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763203 |
| Dimir Bounce | enter | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Jeskai Control | scipios | 8-1 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12763190 |
| Jeskai Control | soulstrong | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769865 |
| Jeskai Control | spyromancer | 7-1 | None |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Dimir Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 5 Color Legends , Azorius Affinity , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Cage , Azorius Control , Azorius Convoke , Azorius Flash
Meta Performance Analysis
Tishana's Tidebinder ranks #278 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 68%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Tishana's Tidebinder is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 14.24 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Tishana's Tidebinder has a win rate of 73.0%, making it 1.7% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyze the Pollen | Sorcery | 5 | 72.5% | 1 |
| Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 71 | 65.3% | 9 |
| Leyline of the Void | Enchantment | 9 | 63.9% | 4 |
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 11 | 63.4% | 2 |
| Shore Up | Instant | 5 | 63.2% | 1 |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 21 | 63.0% | 2 |
| Pest Control | Sorcery | 8 | 61.5% | 0 |
| Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 101 | 61.0% | 35 |
| Glass Casket | Artifact | 5 | 60.8% | 0 |
| Ajani, Caller of the Pride | Legendary Planeswalker — Ajani | 7 | 60.8% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Tishana's Tidebinder than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Defiled Crypt/Cadaver Lab | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 5 | 5 | 85.7% | 72.7% | +13.1% |
| The Filigree Sylex | Legendary Artifact | 2 | 9 | 85.7% | 72.9% | +12.8% |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 2 | 7 | 88.2% | 75.5% | +12.7% |
| Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 5 | 86.4% | 75.5% | +10.8% |
| Opt | Instant | 1 | 6 | 86.2% | 76.0% | +10.2% |
| Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 86.2% | 76.5% | +9.7% |
| Momentum Breaker | Enchantment | 2 | 11 | 80.0% | 72.9% | +7.1% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 22 | 82.4% | 75.3% | +7.1% |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 79.5% | 73.4% | +6.1% |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 1 | 37 | 80.4% | 74.3% | +6.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 1974 | 95.3% | 51.5% |
| Dimir Bounce | 457 | 92.5% | 49.9% |
| Azorius Control | 348 | 91.6% | 53.0% |
| Esper Pixie | 221 | 14.2% | 49.4% |
| Azorius Flash | 175 | 77.4% | 57.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.